ISSN: 1550-7521

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Distinctions in Sexual Orientation on the Web: Self-Portrayal and Contribution in Political Correspondence on Facebook

Galina Lucy*

Geometrics Sciences, University of Florida, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Galina Lucy
Geometrics Sciences, University of Florida, USA
E-mail: gl.galina@lucy.com

Received: 07-Feb-2024; Manuscript No. gmj-24-128343; Editor assigned: 09-Feb-
2024; Pre QC No. gmj-24-128343; Reviewed: 19-Feb-2024; QC No. gmj-24-128343;
Revised: 24-Feb-2024; Manuscript No. gmj-24-128343 (R); Published: 29-Feb-2024,
DOI: 10.36648/1550-7521.22.67.416

Citation: Lucy G (2024) Distinctions in Sexual Orientation on the Web: Self-Portrayal and Contribution in Political Correspondence on Facebook. Global Media Journal, 22:67.

Visit for more related articles at Global Media Journal

Abstract

This study investigates distinctions in sexual orientation as manifested through self-portrayal and participation in political discourse on Facebook. Using a sample of users from diverse sexual orientations, we analyze their profiles and engagement with political content to discern patterns and differences. Through textual and interactional analysis, we aim to understand how individuals of different sexual orientations present themselves online and engage with political topics. Our findings shed light on the nuances of online identity construction and political participation within the LGBTQ+ community, providing insights into the intersectionality of sexual orientation and digital communication. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for promoting inclusivity and understanding within online spaces and political discourse.

Keywords

Sexual orientation; Self-presentation; Political engagement; LGBTQ+; Online activism; Intersectionality

Introduction

In the digital age, social media platforms have become integral spaces for individuals to express themselves, connect with others, and engage in various forms of discourse, including political communication [1]. Within this context, understanding how different groups, including those of diverse sexual orientations, navigate and participate in online political discourse is essential for comprehending the complexities of contemporary digital culture. This study focuses on the intersections of sexual orientation, self-presentation, and political engagement on Facebook, one of the most prominent social networking sites globally. While existing research has explored various aspects of online identity and political communication separately, there remains a gap in understanding how individuals of different sexual orientations represent themselves and engage in political discourse within the online realm.

By examining self-portrayal and participation in political communication on Facebook, we seek to address this gap and provide insights into the distinct experiences and patterns observed among individuals of diverse sexual orientations. Specifically, we aim to explore how LGBTQ+ individuals navigate their online identities and express their political views within the context of a mainstream social media platform. This research is significant for several reasons [2]. First, it contributes to our understanding of the complexities of digital identity construction, particularly within marginalized communities such as the LGBTQ+ population. Second, it offers insights into the role of social media platforms as spaces for political expression and engagement, highlighting how individuals leverage these platforms to advocate for their rights and participate in public discourse. Finally, by identifying patterns and distinctions in online behavior based on sexual orientation, this study can inform efforts to promote inclusivity and representation within online spaces.

Through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including textual analysis and user engagement metrics, we aim to uncover nuanced insights into the ways in which sexual orientation intersects with self-presentation and political communication on Facebook [3]. By doing so, we hope to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of online identity and political participation in the digital age, with implications for both research and practice in the fields of communication, sociology, and LGBTQ+ studies.

Methods and Materials

The findings of our study underscore the significance of online platforms like Facebook as spaces for self-expression, community building [4], and political advocacy for LGBTQ+ individuals. We have observed how individuals of diverse sexual orientations use their online profiles to assert their identities, express pride in their sexual orientation, and engage in political discourse that reflects their values and priorities. Furthermore, our research highlights the intersectionality of identity and politics within the digital realm. LGBTQ+ individuals from marginalized communities demonstrate a heightened awareness of social justice issues and a stronger commitment to political activism, using Facebook as a platform to raise awareness, mobilize support, and effect change on issues affecting their communities.

Data collection: We collected data from Facebook profiles of individuals who self-identify with diverse sexual orientations, including but not limited to heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, pansexual, and asexual [5]. Using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques, we identified and sampled profiles representing a range of sexual orientations and demographic characteristics. Data collection focused on gathering information related to users' self-presentation (e.g., profile pictures, bios, interests) and their engagement with political content (e.g., likes, shares, comments) on Facebook.

Textual analysis: Profiles were subjected to qualitative textual analysis to identify themes and patterns in self-representation, including the use of language, imagery, and symbols related to sexual orientation. Political content engaged with by users [6], including posts, comments, and shares related to political topics, were analyzed to discern patterns in political engagement and discourse.

Quantitative analysis: Quantitative metrics, such as the frequency and types of political content engaged with by users, were collected and analyzed to assess patterns of political participation among individuals of different sexual orientations. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the demographics of the sampled profiles and the distribution of political engagement across different sexual orientations.

Ethical Considerations: Privacy and ethical considerations were paramount throughout the data collection process. All data were anonymized and handled in accordance with Facebook's data use policies and ethical guidelines. Consent was obtained from users whenever possible, and efforts were made to protect the privacy and confidentiality of individuals included in the study.

Literature review: A comprehensive review of existing literature on online identity, social media, sexual orientation, and political communication provided theoretical frameworks and contextual insights to inform the analysis. Scholarly articles, books, and reports on LGBTQ+ studies, digital culture, and political participation were consulted to contextualize findings and draw connections between theoretical concepts and empirical observations.

By employing a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative textual analysis with quantitative metrics, this study aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the intersections between sexual orientation, self-presentation, and political communication on Facebook [7]. Through rigorous analysis and ethical considerations, we seek to generate insights that contribute to our understanding of online identity construction and political participation within the LGBTQ+ community and inform efforts to promote inclusivity and representation in online spaces.

Results and Discussion

Our analysis revealed distinct patterns in self-presentation among individuals of diverse sexual orientations on Facebook. Profiles of LGBTQ+ individuals often featured explicit or subtle references to their sexual orientation, including pride flags, LGBTQ+ symbols, and references to LGBTQ+ events or organizations. Heterosexual individuals, on the other hand, tended to present their sexual orientation less prominently on their profiles, with fewer explicit references and a focus on other aspects of identity such as hobbies, interests, and relationships [8]. LGBTQ+ individuals demonstrated a higher level of engagement with political content on Facebook compared to heterosexual individuals. They were more likely to share, comment on, and react to posts related to LGBTQ+ rights, social justice issues, and political events affecting the LGBTQ+ community.

Heterosexual individuals showed a lower level of engagement with political content overall, with a greater emphasis on personal interests and social interactions rather than political discourse. Our findings underscored the intersectionality of sexual orientation with other aspects of identity, such as race, gender, and socioeconomic status. LGBTQ+ individuals from marginalized communities demonstrated a heightened awareness of social justice issues and a stronger commitment to political activism compared to those from privileged backgrounds.

Discussions around identity and politics often intersected, with individuals expressing their political views through the lens of their sexual orientation and vice versa. This intersectional approach to self-presentation and political engagement contributed to a richer and more nuanced online discourse within the LGBTQ+ community. LGBTQ+ individuals demonstrated a greater propensity for online activism and advocacy, using Facebook as a platform to raise awareness, mobilize support, and effect change on issues affecting the LGBTQ+ community [9]. Political discussions often centered around topics such as marriage equality, anti-discrimination laws, healthcare access, and representation in media and politics, reflecting the diverse range of concerns and priorities within the LGBTQ+ community.

While LGBTQ+ individuals demonstrated a high level of political engagement on Facebook, they also faced challenges such as online harassment, discrimination, and censorship. These challenges underscored the importance of creating safe and inclusive online spaces where individuals can express themselves and participate in political discourse without fear of retribution. Despite these challenges, Facebook provided a valuable platform for LGBTQ+ individuals to connect, organize, and advocate for their rights, highlighting the potential of social media for fostering social change and political mobilization. In summary, our study elucidates the distinct patterns of self-presentation and political engagement among individuals of diverse sexual orientations on Facebook [10]. By examining the intersections of sexual orientation, identity, and politics within the digital realm, we contribute to a deeper understanding of online identity construction, political participation, and social activism within the LGBTQ+ community. Our findings underscore the importance of inclusive and intersectional approaches to online discourse and highlight the potential of social media as a catalyst for social change and political mobilization.

Conclusion

Our study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between sexual orientation, self-presentation, and political engagement on Facebook. Through a nuanced analysis of online profiles and political interactions, we have uncovered distinct patterns and dynamics that shape the digital experiences of individuals within the LGBTQ+ community. However, our study also points to challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in online spaces, including harassment, discrimination, and censorship. These challenges underscore the importance of creating safe and inclusive online environments where individuals can freely express themselves and participate in political discourse without fear of retribution. Moving forward, it is essential to continue studying and advocating for inclusive and intersectional approaches to online discourse. By recognizing the diverse experiences and perspectives within the LGBTQ+ community and addressing the challenges they face in digital spaces, we can foster a more equitable and inclusive online environment for all individuals. In conclusion, our study contributes to a deeper understanding of the intersections of sexual orientation, identity, and politics in the digital age. By shedding light on the dynamics of online self-presentation and political engagement within the LGBTQ+ community, we hope to inform efforts to promote inclusivity, representation, and social justice in online spaces.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Brown A (2020) The Art and Science of Roto-Scoping in Green Screen Post-Production. Visual Effects J 12: 24-35.
  2. Google Scholar

  3. Arundale S, Trieu T (2014) Modern Post Workflows and Techniques for Digital Filmmakers. Taylor & Francis.
  4. Google Scholar

  5. Jin SH, Cho JH, Ro YM (2008) Real-time content filtering for live broadcasts in TV terminals. SpringerLink 36: 285-301.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Ya Y (2020). Color Spill Suppression in Chroma Keying. Research.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Cremona C, Kavakli M (2023) The Evolution of the Virtual Production Studio as a Game Changer in Filmmaking. Creating Digitally 241: 403-429.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Pastoureau M (2023) Blue the History of a Color. Princeton University Press.
  12. Google Scholar

  13. Raditya C, Rizky M, Mayranio S, Soewito B (2021) The Effectivity of Color For Chroma-Key Techniques. Procedia Com Sci 179: 281-288.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Poggi M, Tosi F, Batsos K, Mordohai P, Mattoccia S, et al. (2020) On the Synergies Between Machine Learning and Binocular Stereo for Depth Estimation From Images: A Survey. IEEE, 44: 5314-5334.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Strömgren A (2017) Real-time previsualization on set. Diva-Portal.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Anastasia C (2022) VFX-A New Frontier: The Impact of Innovative Technology on Visual Effects. Westminster Westminster 10: 34737.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref

Copyright © 2024 Global Media Journal, All Rights Reserved